Editorial: Would Malcolm Shabazz Approve?

Posted on September 8, 2006 by


mx1.gifThe other day I stumbled upon the website for the new Malcolm Shabazz Court apartments being built on 116th Street. As one who is always looking for a better living situation I considered putting in an application. After all, a video intercom, landscaped plaza and dishwasher are a step up from where I live presently. What I failed to do was read the accompanying cover letter first. Had I done so I would have know that they are renting one bedrooms for around $1400 and two bedrooms for $1810. Even without the anticipated yearly rent increases the apartments are way above the comparable offerings just two or three years ago when newly renovated, rent-stabilized apartments were being offered for under $900 a month.

There is nothing unique about the units being offered at Shabazz Court and the developers are not marketing the property as “luxury” apartments, so what gives? We know that the median income in Harlem is well below the U.S. national average, yet the minimum income for these apartments is close to $56K a year.

I asked a friend what she thought about this and she seemed to think that they are intentionally out-pricing Harlem residents. Could she be onto something? After all, I did come across a listing for condos being offered by the Homeworks program for well above the listings just a few years back. Homeworks is the same program mentioned in a post on Monday that sold homes for $250K which are now fetching well over $1 million. The same program is now offering condos in the area extending from 111th Street to 127th Street for prices ranging between $415K to as high as $800K. The minimum income requirements are also well above the typical income of most Harlem residents, starting at $123,617.

Were the subsidies and tax breaks just a foot in the door for developers to take advantage of the property sitting dormant above 96th Street or will this increase somehow trickle down to help low-income Harlem residents pull themselves up? Discuss amongst yourselves.

Related: New York Times

Advertisement